Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Combining Static and Contextualised Multilingual Embeddings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.09326 v1 pith:4O4F7XJG submitted 2022-03-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords embeddingsstaticmultilingualcontextualcontinuedpre-trainingxlm-ralign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Static and contextual multilingual embeddings have complementary strengths. Static embeddings, while less expressive than contextual language models, can be more straightforwardly aligned across multiple languages. We combine the strengths of static and contextual models to improve multilingual representations. We extract static embeddings for 40 languages from XLM-R, validate those embeddings with cross-lingual word retrieval, and then align them using VecMap. This results in high-quality, highly multilingual static embeddings. Then we apply a novel continued pre-training approach to XLM-R, leveraging the high quality alignment of our static embeddings to better align the representation space of XLM-R. We show positive results for multiple complex semantic tasks. We release the static embeddings and the continued pre-training code. Unlike most previous work, our continued pre-training approach does not require parallel text.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Rethinking Hybrid Retrieval: When Small Embeddings and LLM Re-ranking Beat Bigger Models

    cs.IR 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    In tri-modal hybrid retrieval with GPT-4o reranking, MiniLM-v6 matches or beats BGE-Large on SciFact, FIQA, and NFCorpus despite being far smaller.

Pith tools