Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Which is a better cosmological probe: Number counts or cosmic magnification?
As of 13 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2203.11159.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-05-09T23:09:31.291563Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T14:16:05.047395Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation 8ecf29e0-cd8b-4f50-8504-a66dc4a92b9f · inbound
Relativistic effects in k-essence cites this paper.
Relativistic effects in k-essence Which is a better cosmological probe: Number counts or cosmic magnification?
Reference 32
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T14:16:05.050517Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-13T06:32:02.005865+00:00.