Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Fairness Evaluation Metrics for Contextualized Language Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.13928 v1 pith:BPBSVOPL submitted 2022-03-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords metricsextrinsicfairnessintrinsiclanguagecontextualizedemphevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multiple metrics have been introduced to measure fairness in various natural language processing tasks. These metrics can be roughly categorized into two categories: 1) \emph{extrinsic metrics} for evaluating fairness in downstream applications and 2) \emph{intrinsic metrics} for estimating fairness in upstream contextualized language representation models. In this paper, we conduct an extensive correlation study between intrinsic and extrinsic metrics across bias notions using 19 contextualized language models. We find that intrinsic and extrinsic metrics do not necessarily correlate in their original setting, even when correcting for metric misalignments, noise in evaluation datasets, and confounding factors such as experiment configuration for extrinsic metrics. %al

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantifying Misattribution Unfairness in Authorship Attribution

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Authorship attribution models misattribute texts to some authors far more often than chance, and the risk is highest for authors whose author embeddings sit near the centroid.

Pith tools