Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Vulnerability Detection in Open Source Software: An Introduction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.16428 v1 pith:ORB3O4F5 submitted 2022-03-06 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords opensourcedetectionvulnerabilitiessoftwarehumanmadevulnerability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper is an introductory discussion on the cause of open source software vulnerabilities, their importance in the cybersecurity ecosystem, and a selection of detection methods. A recent application security report showed 44% of applications contain critical vulnerabilities in an open source component, a concerning proportion. Most companies do not have a reliable way of being directly and promptly notified when zero-day vulnerabilities are found and then when patches are made available. This means attack vectors in open source exist longer than necessary. Conventional approaches to vulnerability detection are outlined alongside some newer research trends. A conclusion is made that it may not be possible to entirely replace expert human inspection of open source software, although it can be effectively augmented with techniques such as machine learning, IDE plug-ins and repository linking to make implementation and review less time intensive. Underpinning any technological advances should be better knowledge at the human level. Development teams need trained, coached and improved so they can implement open source more securely, know what vulnerabilities to look for and how to handle them. It is the use of this blended approach to detection which is key.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance

    cs.CY 2024-12 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    Model access decisions should be studied and coordinated through a dedicated research field, with recommendations for evaluators, companies, governments, and international bodies.

  2. AI Safety Frameworks Should Include Procedures for Model Access Decisions

    cs.CY 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces Responsible Access Policies as a recommended component of frontier AI safety frameworks for governing model access.

Pith tools