REVIEW 1 cited by
Video Captioning: a comparative review of where we are and which could be the route
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Video captioning is the process of describing the content of a sequence of images capturing its semantic relationships and meanings. Dealing with this task with a single image is arduous, not to mention how difficult it is for a video (or images sequence). The amount and relevance of the applications of video captioning are vast, mainly to deal with a significant amount of video recordings in video surveillance, or assisting people visually impaired, to mention a few. To analyze where the efforts of our community to solve the video captioning task are, as well as what route could be better to follow, this manuscript presents an extensive review of more than 105 papers for the period of 2016 to 2021. As a result, the most-used datasets and metrics are identified. Also, the main approaches used and the best ones. We compute a set of rankings based on several performance metrics to obtain, according to its performance, the best method with the best result on the video captioning task. Finally, some insights are concluded about which could be the next steps or opportunity areas to improve dealing with this complex task.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bridging the Data Provenance Gap Across Text, Speech and Video
A manual audit of nearly 4,000 text, speech, and video datasets finds AI training data increasingly comes from web and social media sources, carries hidden non-commercial restrictions, and remains Western-centric with...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.