Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

You Are What You Write: Preserving Privacy in the Era of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.09391 v1 pith:XJ6UFIEB submitted 2022-04-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsinformationlargedatalanguageprivacy-preservinghighlymodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large scale adoption of large language models has introduced a new era of convenient knowledge transfer for a slew of natural language processing tasks. However, these models also run the risk of undermining user trust by exposing unwanted information about the data subjects, which may be extracted by a malicious party, e.g. through adversarial attacks. We present an empirical investigation into the extent of the personal information encoded into pre-trained representations by a range of popular models, and we show a positive correlation between the complexity of a model, the amount of data used in pre-training, and data leakage. In this paper, we present the first wide coverage evaluation and comparison of some of the most popular privacy-preserving algorithms, on a large, multi-lingual dataset on sentiment analysis annotated with demographic information (location, age and gender). The results show since larger and more complex models are more prone to leaking private information, use of privacy-preserving methods is highly desirable. We also find that highly privacy-preserving technologies like differential privacy (DP) can have serious model utility effects, which can be ameliorated using hybrid or metric-DP techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tuning-Free Personalized Alignment via Trial-Error-Explain In-Context Learning

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    TICL improves style personalization by iteratively adding model-generated negative examples and explanations to an in-context prompt, beating fine-tuned baselines in LLM-judged comparisons without any parameter updates.

  2. A Survey on Data Security in Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of data security risks in LLMs that organizes threats, defenses, and evaluation datasets, with notable factual errors in its tables.

Pith tools