Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

QAMPARI: An Open-domain Question Answering Benchmark for Questions with Many Answers from Multiple Paragraphs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.12665 v4 pith:RGWJBACO submitted 2022-05-25 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords questionsanswersmanyodqaqampariquestionansweringparagraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing benchmarks for open-domain question answering (ODQA) typically focus on questions whose answers can be extracted from a single paragraph. By contrast, many natural questions, such as "What players were drafted by the Brooklyn Nets?" have a list of answers. Answering such questions requires retrieving and reading from many passages, in a large corpus. We introduce QAMPARI, an ODQA benchmark, where question answers are lists of entities, spread across many paragraphs. We created QAMPARI by (a) generating questions with multiple answers from Wikipedia's knowledge graph and tables, (b) automatically pairing answers with supporting evidence in Wikipedia paragraphs, and (c) manually paraphrasing questions and validating each answer. We train ODQA models from the retrieve-and-read family and find that QAMPARI is challenging in terms of both passage retrieval and answer generation, reaching an F1 score of 32.8 at best. Our results highlight the need for developing ODQA models that handle a broad range of question types, including single and multi-answer questions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating List Construction and Temporal Understanding capabilities of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows LLMs give incomplete lists and inaccurate time intervals for temporal list questions, and retrieval helps only partly.

  2. LongCat Sparse Attention: Taming the Lightning via Streaming-aware Hierarchical Cross-Layer Indexing

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper reports that LongCat Sparse Attention matches full attention quality while reducing indexing overhead and supporting one-million-token training.

  3. Multi-granular Training Strategies for Robust Multi-hop Reasoning Over Noisy and Heterogeneous Knowledge Sources

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    AMKOR is described as a state-of-the-art multi-hop QA system, but the paper provides no reproducible evidence and the reported numbers appear unverifiable.

Pith tools