Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Surround-view Fisheye Camera Perception for Automated Driving: Overview, Survey and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.13281 v2 pith:7F6NF4ZN submitted 2022-05-26 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords perceptionfisheyesurround-viewautomatedcameracameraschallengesdriving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Surround-view fisheye cameras are commonly used for near-field sensing in automated driving. Four fisheye cameras on four sides of the vehicle are sufficient to cover 360{\deg} around the vehicle capturing the entire near-field region. Some primary use cases are automated parking, traffic jam assist, and urban driving. There are limited datasets and very little work on near-field perception tasks as the focus in automotive perception is on far-field perception. In contrast to far-field, surround-view perception poses additional challenges due to high precision object detection requirements of 10cm and partial visibility of objects. Due to the large radial distortion of fisheye cameras, standard algorithms cannot be extended easily to the surround-view use case. Thus, we are motivated to provide a self-contained reference for automotive fisheye camera perception for researchers and practitioners. Firstly, we provide a unified and taxonomic treatment of commonly used fisheye camera models. Secondly, we discuss various perception tasks and existing literature. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Image Segmentation: Inducing graph-based learning

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Adding a GNN bottleneck to U-Net improves segmentation IoU on fisheye, natural, and dermoscopic images, with the largest gains on fisheye imagery.

Pith tools