Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Task-Specific Expert Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00277 v2 pith:JQSXXCPU submitted 2022-06-01 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords modelinferencesparsebenefitscommunicationdownstreamexpertexperts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model is powerful for large-scale pre-training and has achieved promising results due to its model capacity. However, with trillions of parameters, MoE is hard to be deployed on cloud or mobile environment. The inference of MoE requires expert parallelism, which is not hardware-friendly and communication expensive. Especially for resource-limited downstream tasks, such sparse structure has to sacrifice a lot of computing efficiency for limited performance gains. In this work, we observe most experts contribute scarcely little to the MoE fine-tuning and inference. We further propose a general method to progressively drop the non-professional experts for the target downstream task, which preserves the benefits of MoE while reducing the MoE model into one single-expert dense model. Our experiments reveal that the fine-tuned single-expert model could preserve 99.3% benefits from MoE across six different types of tasks while enjoying 2x inference speed with free communication cost.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Communication-Aware Placement and Pruning for Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Inference

    cs.DC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Communication-aware expert placement plus device-level pruning yields 1.23–1.86× MoE inference throughput and better accuracy at equal speedup than load-balance or sequential baselines.

  2. Dropping Experts, Recombining Neurons: Retraining-Free Pruning for Sparse Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DERN prunes SMoE LLMs by decomposing removed experts into neuron segments, reassigning the best-matching ones to kept experts, and clustering them into compact replacements, beating prior pruning baselines without retraining.

  3. Unified Start, Personalized End: Progressive Pruning for Efficient 3D Medical Image Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PSP-Seg prunes redundant modules during training to make 3D segmentation networks much smaller and faster without losing accuracy.

  4. Bridging Brains and Models: MoE-Based Functional Lesions for Simulating and Rehabilitating Aphasia

    q-bio.NC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deleting syntax- or semantics-specialized experts in a Mixture-of-Experts language model reproduces Broca's- and Wernicke's-like aphasia, and retraining the remaining experts models functional recovery.

Pith tools