Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Challenges in Applying Explainability Methods to Improve the Fairness of NLP Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.03945 v1 pith:CROKAJK2 submitted 2022-06-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords methodsexplainabilityfairnessbiasmodelsoftenappliedapplying
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Motivations for methods in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) often include detecting, quantifying and mitigating bias, and contributing to making machine learning models fairer. However, exactly how an XAI method can help in combating biases is often left unspecified. In this paper, we briefly review trends in explainability and fairness in NLP research, identify the current practices in which explainability methods are applied to detect and mitigate bias, and investigate the barriers preventing XAI methods from being used more widely in tackling fairness issues.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools