REVIEW 2 cited by
Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We consider the problem of inferring high-dimensional data $\mathbf{x}$ in a model that consists of a prior $p(\mathbf{x})$ and an auxiliary differentiable constraint $c(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y})$ on $x$ given some additional information $\mathbf{y}$. In this paper, the prior is an independently trained denoising diffusion generative model. The auxiliary constraint is expected to have a differentiable form, but can come from diverse sources. The possibility of such inference turns diffusion models into plug-and-play modules, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks, such as conditional generation or image segmentation. The structure of diffusion models allows us to perform approximate inference by iterating differentiation through the fixed denoising network enriched with different amounts of noise at each step. Considering many noised versions of $\mathbf{x}$ in evaluation of its fitness is a novel search mechanism that may lead to new algorithms for solving combinatorial optimization problems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fast T2T: Optimization Consistency Speeds Up Diffusion-Based Training-to-Testing Solving for Combinatorial Optimization
Fast T2T trains diffusion-based combinatorial optimization solvers to map any noise level directly to near-optimal solutions, enabling one-step inference and large speedups over step-by-step diffusion baselines.
-
Provable diffusion-based posterior sampling for linear inverse problems via DDIM
A SVD-based, coordinate-wise DDIM sampler is claimed to asymptotically sample from the posterior for noisy linear inverse problems, but the proof's posterior identification step does not follow from the stated updates.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.