Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What does it take to solve the measurement problem?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10445 v3 pith:6GAOB6ZZ submitted 2022-06-21 quant-ph physics.hist-ph

Jonte R. Hance , Sabine Hossenfelder This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.hist-ph
keywords problemmeasurementmechanicsquantumsolvesolutionwhatargue
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We summarise different aspects of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. We argue that it is a real problem which requires a solution, and identify the properties a theory needs to solve the problem. We show that no current interpretation of quantum mechanics solves the problem, and that, being interpretations rather than extensions of quantum mechanics, they cannot solve it. Finally, we speculate what a solution of the measurement problem might be good for.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The burden of Fundamentality: Metaphysical ambiguities and the issue of Superdeterminism

    physics.hist-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Superdeterminism is split into naive, metaphysical, and toy forms; naive forms illegitimately assume fundamentality, and Invariant Set Theory is committed to a confused priority monism.

Pith tools