REVIEW 3 cited by
AixBench: A Code Generation Benchmark Dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a benchmark dataset for evaluating method-level code generation task. The benchmark contains a dataset of 175 samples for automated evaluation and a dataset of 161 samples for manual evaluation. We also present a new metric for automatically evaluating the correctness of the generated code, and a set of criteria to manually evaluating the overall quality of the generated code.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
LessLeak-Bench: A First Investigation of Data Leakage in LLMs Across 83 Software Engineering Benchmarks
Across 83 SE benchmarks, average leakage into StarCoder's pretraining data is 4.8% (Python), 2.8% (Java), and 0.7% (C/C++), but QuixBugs and BigCloneBench are 100% and 55.7% leaked.
-
Unseen Horizons: Unveiling the Real Capability of LLM Code Generation Beyond the Familiar
A code-obfuscation benchmark shows LLM code generation pass rates fall sharply when descriptions, code, and dependencies are rewritten to remove training-data familiarity.
-
The Current Challenges of Software Engineering in the Era of Large Language Models
The paper reports 26 challenges in LLM-based software engineering, grouped into seven aspects, derived from a structured discussion among 24 academics and practitioners.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.