REVIEW 4 cited by
Forecasting Future World Events with Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Forecasting future world events is a challenging but valuable task. Forecasts of climate, geopolitical conflict, pandemics and economic indicators help shape policy and decision making. In these domains, the judgment of expert humans contributes to the best forecasts. Given advances in language modeling, can these forecasts be automated? To this end, we introduce Autocast, a dataset containing thousands of forecasting questions and an accompanying news corpus. Questions are taken from forecasting tournaments, ensuring high quality, real-world importance, and diversity. The news corpus is organized by date, allowing us to precisely simulate the conditions under which humans made past forecasts (avoiding leakage from the future). Motivated by the difficulty of forecasting numbers across orders of magnitude (e.g. global cases of COVID-19 in 2022), we also curate IntervalQA, a dataset of numerical questions and metrics for calibration. We test language models on our forecasting task and find that performance is far below a human expert baseline. However, performance improves with increased model size and incorporation of relevant information from the news corpus. In sum, Autocast poses a novel challenge for large language models and improved performance could bring large practical benefits.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
SocietyBench: Forecasting Counterfactual Social-World Evolution
A new benchmark measures LLM social-world forecasting on anonymized real events, finding the best model reaches 75/100 and agent scaffolding does not help.
-
Predicting Empirical AI Research Outcomes with Language Models
A fine-tuned, retrieval-augmented language model predicts which of two AI research ideas will perform better empirically, beating human experts and frontier models on a new contamination-controlled benchmark.
-
Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs
BLF achieves state-of-the-art binary forecasting on ForecastBench by using linguistic belief states updated in tool-use loops, hierarchical multi-trial logit averaging, and hierarchical Platt scaling calibration.
-
Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model Forecasters
A systematic critique showing temporal leakage and extrapolation flaws can undermine claims that LLM forecasters match or beat humans.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.