Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Forecasting Future World Events with Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.15474 v2 pith:QYKXLYAX submitted 2022-06-30 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords forecastingforecastscorpusfuturelanguagenewsperformancequestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Forecasting future world events is a challenging but valuable task. Forecasts of climate, geopolitical conflict, pandemics and economic indicators help shape policy and decision making. In these domains, the judgment of expert humans contributes to the best forecasts. Given advances in language modeling, can these forecasts be automated? To this end, we introduce Autocast, a dataset containing thousands of forecasting questions and an accompanying news corpus. Questions are taken from forecasting tournaments, ensuring high quality, real-world importance, and diversity. The news corpus is organized by date, allowing us to precisely simulate the conditions under which humans made past forecasts (avoiding leakage from the future). Motivated by the difficulty of forecasting numbers across orders of magnitude (e.g. global cases of COVID-19 in 2022), we also curate IntervalQA, a dataset of numerical questions and metrics for calibration. We test language models on our forecasting task and find that performance is far below a human expert baseline. However, performance improves with increased model size and incorporation of relevant information from the news corpus. In sum, Autocast poses a novel challenge for large language models and improved performance could bring large practical benefits.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SocietyBench: Forecasting Counterfactual Social-World Evolution

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new benchmark measures LLM social-world forecasting on anonymized real events, finding the best model reaches 75/100 and agent scaffolding does not help.

  2. Predicting Empirical AI Research Outcomes with Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned, retrieval-augmented language model predicts which of two AI research ideas will perform better empirically, beating human experts and frontier models on a new contamination-controlled benchmark.

  3. Agentic Forecasting using Sequential Bayesian Updating of Linguistic Beliefs

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.5 of 10

    BLF achieves state-of-the-art binary forecasting on ForecastBench by using linguistic belief states updated in tool-use loops, hierarchical multi-trial logit averaging, and hierarchical Platt scaling calibration.

  4. Pitfalls in Evaluating Language Model Forecasters

    cs.LG 2025-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic critique showing temporal leakage and extrapolation flaws can undermine claims that LLM forecasters match or beat humans.

Pith tools