REVIEW 2 cited by
TESS light curves of cataclysmic variables I -- Unknown periods in long-known stars
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Cataclysmic variables (CVs) exhibit a plethora of variable phenomena many of which require long, uninterrupted light curves to reveal themselves in detail. The month long datasets provided by TESS are well suited for this purpose. TESS has the additional advantage to have observed a huge number of stars, among them many CVs. Here, a search for periodic variations in a sample of CVs of the novalike and old novae subtypes is presented. In 10 of the 15 targets either previously unseen positive or negative superhumps or unusual features in known superhumps are identified. The TESS light curves demonstrate that the occurrence of superhumps in these types of CVs is not an exception but quite common. For 8 systems new or improved values for the orbital period are measured. In TV Col the long-sought optical manifestation of the white dwarf spin period is first seen in form of its orbital sideband. The mystery of multiple photometric periods observed in CP Pup in the past is explained by irregularly occurring anomalous states which are reflected in the light curve.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Cataclysmic Variables Photometric Periods from TESS
TESS photometry yields coherent periods for 1,362 CVs, including roughly 465–565 first determinations, and confirms the 2–3 h period gap with a median period near 3.68 h.
-
Selected Results on Variable Stars Observed by TESS
A curated review of TESS-era results across the major classes of variable stars, with illustrative light curves, but with no new observational or theoretical result.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.