REVIEW 4 cited by
RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce REALTIME QA, a dynamic question answering (QA) platform that announces questions and evaluates systems on a regular basis (weekly in this version). REALTIME QA inquires about the current world, and QA systems need to answer questions about novel events or information. It therefore challenges static, conventional assumptions in open-domain QA datasets and pursues instantaneous applications. We build strong baseline models upon large pretrained language models, including GPT-3 and T5. Our benchmark is an ongoing effort, and this paper presents real-time evaluation results over the past year. Our experimental results show that GPT-3 can often properly update its generation results, based on newly-retrieved documents, highlighting the importance of up-to-date information retrieval. Nonetheless, we find that GPT-3 tends to return outdated answers when retrieved documents do not provide sufficient information to find an answer. This suggests an important avenue for future research: can an open-domain QA system identify such unanswerable cases and communicate with the user or even the retrieval module to modify the retrieval results? We hope that REALTIME QA will spur progress in instantaneous applications of question answering and beyond.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Will It Still Be True Tomorrow? Multilingual Evergreen Question Classification to Improve Trustworthy QA
EverGreenQA and EG-E5 provide a multilingual, human-labeled evergreen question classifier that improves self-knowledge estimation and QA dataset curation.
-
Evaluating List Construction and Temporal Understanding capabilities of Large Language Models
A new benchmark shows LLMs give incomplete lists and inaccurate time intervals for temporal list questions, and retrieval helps only partly.
-
DailyQA: A Benchmark to Evaluate Web Retrieval Augmented LLMs Based on Capturing Real-World Changes
DailyQA, automatically built from Wikipedia revision logs, shows that LLMs with web retrieval answer only about half of time-sensitive questions correctly, and that reranking documents outperforms both snippets and ti...
-
MedBrowseComp: Benchmarking Medical Deep Research and Computer Use
A new benchmark of more than 1,000 multi-hop medical browsing questions shows that even the best deep-research and computer-use AI agents answer fewer than half correctly.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.