Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automatically Categorising GitHub Repositories by Application Domain

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.00269 v1 pith:SC3RRNXF submitted 2022-07-30 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords repositoriesapplicationgithubdomaindomainsworkclassifierapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

GitHub is the largest host of open source software on the Internet. This large, freely accessible database has attracted the attention of practitioners and researchers alike. But as GitHub's growth continues, it is becoming increasingly hard to navigate the plethora of repositories which span a wide range of domains. Past work has shown that taking the application domain into account is crucial for tasks such as predicting the popularity of a repository and reasoning about project quality. In this work, we build on a previously annotated dataset of 5,000 GitHub repositories to design an automated classifier for categorising repositories by their application domain. The classifier uses state-of-the-art natural language processing techniques and machine learning to learn from multiple data sources and catalogue repositories according to five application domains. We contribute with (1) an automated classifier that can assign popular repositories to each application domain with at least 70% precision, (2) an investigation of the approach's performance on less popular repositories, and (3) a practical application of this approach to answer how the adoption of software engineering practices differs across application domains. Our work aims to help the GitHub community identify repositories of interest and opens promising avenues for future work investigating differences between repositories from different application domains.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maintenance Signals in AI-Assisted GitHub Repositories: Evidence from GenAI Adopters

    cs.SE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GitHub developers who openly use GenAI produce repositories with more structured docs, while their issues concentrate on external AI-provider dependencies such as API rate limits.

Pith tools