Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PEER: A Collaborative Language Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11663 v1 pith:SZFBLBCJ submitted 2022-08-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords peercollaborativeprocesswritingactionslanguagedomainsmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Textual content is often the output of a collaborative writing process: We start with an initial draft, ask for suggestions, and repeatedly make changes. Agnostic of this process, today's language models are trained to generate only the final result. As a consequence, they lack several abilities crucial for collaborative writing: They are unable to update existing texts, difficult to control and incapable of verbally planning or explaining their actions. To address these shortcomings, we introduce PEER, a collaborative language model that is trained to imitate the entire writing process itself: PEER can write drafts, add suggestions, propose edits and provide explanations for its actions. Crucially, we train multiple instances of PEER able to infill various parts of the writing process, enabling the use of self-training techniques for increasing the quality, amount and diversity of training data. This unlocks PEER's full potential by making it applicable in domains for which no edit histories are available and improving its ability to follow instructions, to write useful comments, and to explain its actions. We show that PEER achieves strong performance across various domains and editing tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 44 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new corpus and fine-tuned language models predict when web-agent users will intervene, with a small user study reporting 26.5% higher perceived usefulness.

  2. GEIS: A Generation-Evaluation-Improvement Loop of Agent Skills for Long-Form Article Generation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A skill-based generate–evaluate–improve loop raises Wikipedia-style long-form article quality over fixed multi-agent pipelines and self-improves via permanent writing-rule patches.

Pith tools