Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Light-weight probing of unsupervised representations for Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.12345 v2 pith:XWKIU5OV submitted 2022-08-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningunsupervisedalgorithmsprobingrepresentationsvisualgivenlower
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unsupervised visual representation learning offers the opportunity to leverage large corpora of unlabeled trajectories to form useful visual representations, which can benefit the training of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. However, evaluating the fitness of such representations requires training RL algorithms which is computationally intensive and has high variance outcomes. Inspired by the vision community, we study whether linear probing can be a proxy evaluation task for the quality of unsupervised RL representation. Specifically, we probe for the observed reward in a given state and the action of an expert in a given state, both of which are generally applicable to many RL domains. Through rigorous experimentation, we show that the probing tasks are strongly rank correlated with the downstream RL performance on the Atari100k Benchmark, while having lower variance and up to 600x lower computational cost. This provides a more efficient method for exploring the space of pretraining algorithms and identifying promising pretraining recipes without the need to run RL evaluations for every setting. Leveraging this framework, we further improve existing self-supervised learning (SSL) recipes for RL, highlighting the importance of the forward model, the size of the visual backbone, and the precise formulation of the unsupervised objective.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Olaf-World: Orienting Latent Actions for Video World Modeling

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Latent actions become transferable across visual contexts when aligned to temporal feature differences from a frozen video encoder (SeqΔ-REPA), improving zero-shot action transfer and data-efficient adaptation of vide...

  2. Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractors

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Latent action models need at least a small amount of action supervision to learn useful actions when observations contain distractors, as shown on the Distracting Control Suite.

  3. A Survey of State Representation Learning for Deep Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A six-class taxonomy of state representation learning methods for model-free online deep reinforcement learning, with selection guidelines, evaluation metrics, and future directions.

Pith tools