Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A large dataset of software mentions in the biomedical literature

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.00693 v4 pith:GVJFYLL3 submitted 2022-09-01 cs.DL q-bio.OT

classification cs.DLq-bio.OT
keywords softwarementionsdatasetuniquemillioncollectionentitiesextracted
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We describe the CZ Software Mentions dataset, a new dataset of software mentions in biomedical papers. Plain-text software mentions are extracted with a trained SciBERT model from several sources: the NIH PubMed Central collection and from papers provided by various publishers to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. The dataset provides sources, context and metadata, and, for a number of mentions, the disambiguated software entities and links. We extract 1.12 million unique string software mentions from 2.4 million papers in the NIH PMC-OA Commercial subset, 481k unique mentions from the NIH PMC-OA Non-Commercial subset (both gathered in October 2021) and 934k unique mentions from 3 million papers in the Publishers' collection. There is variation in how software is mentioned in papers and extracted by the NER algorithm. We propose a clustering-based disambiguation algorithm to map plain-text software mentions into distinct software entities and apply it on the NIH PubMed Central Commercial collection. Through this methodology, we disambiguate 1.12 million unique strings extracted by the NER model into 97600 unique software entities, covering 78% of all software-paper links. We link 185000 of the mentions to a repository, covering about 55% of all software-paper links. We describe in detail the process of building the datasets, disambiguating and linking the software mentions, as well as opportunities and challenges that come with a dataset of this size. We make all data and code publicly available as a new resource to help assess the impact of software (in particular scientific open source projects) on science.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 7 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. The Reciprocal Impact of Science and Software: A Cross-Corpus Analysis of How Research Shapes Software and Software Enables Research

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Science and software impact each other through complementary strata, but sparse paper–repo linkage makes reuse–citation coupling gap-sensitive and prevents strong decoupling claims.

  2. Extracting Information in a Low-resource Setting: Case Study on Bioinformatics Workflows

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 52-article annotated corpus and baseline NER experiments show that bioinformatics workflow entities can be extracted with 70.4 F1 using SciBERT, supporting the feasibility of automated workflow documentation.

Pith tools