REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey on Measuring and Mitigating Reasoning Shortcuts in Machine Reading Comprehension
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The issue of shortcut learning is widely known in NLP and has been an important research focus in recent years. Unintended correlations in the data enable models to easily solve tasks that were meant to exhibit advanced language understanding and reasoning capabilities. In this survey paper, we focus on the field of machine reading comprehension (MRC), an important task for showcasing high-level language understanding that also suffers from a range of shortcuts. We summarize the available techniques for measuring and mitigating shortcuts and conclude with suggestions for further progress in shortcut research. Importantly, we highlight two concerns for shortcut mitigation in MRC: (1) the lack of public challenge sets, a necessary component for effective and reusable evaluation, and (2) the lack of certain mitigation techniques that are prominent in other areas.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Detecting and Pruning Prominent but Detrimental Neurons in Large Language Models
Pruning the most attribution-prominent MLP neurons in a single layer, chosen via a 10-sample validation sweep, consistently improves multiple-choice accuracy across four instruction-tuned LLMs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.