Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Not As Easy As You Think -- Experiences and Lessons Learnt from Trying to Create a Bottom-Up Visualization Image Typology

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.07533 v2 pith:ZFXIT4TK submitted 2022-09-15 cs.GR cs.MM

classification cs.GRcs.MM
keywords imagevisualizationimagestypologyanalysiscategorizationcommunityfacilitate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present and discuss the results of a two-year qualitative analysis of images published in IEEE Visualization (VIS) papers. Specifically, we derive a typology of 13 visualization image types, coded to distinguish visualizations and several image characteristics. The categorization process required much more time and was more difficult than we initially thought. The resulting typology and image analysis may serve a number of purposes: to study the evolution of the community and its research output over time, to facilitate the categorization of visualization images for the purpose of teaching, to identify visual designs for evaluation purposes, or to enable progress towards standardization in visualization. In addition to the typology and image characterization, we provide a dataset of 6,833 tagged images and an online tool that can be used to explore and analyze the large set of tagged images. We thus facilitate a discussion of the diverse visualizations used and how they are published and communicated in our community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. On Defining Chart Types Boundaries

    cs.HC 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Chart-type definitions are purpose-built constructions, not discovered natural kinds; the paper provides tools to make the boundary decisions in chart-type research explicit and demonstrates them on Gantt, radar, and ...

Pith tools