REVIEW 2 cited by
MetaPrompting: Learning to Learn Better Prompts
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Prompting method is regarded as one of the crucial progress for few-shot nature language processing. Recent research on prompting moves from discrete tokens based ``hard prompts'' to continuous ``soft prompts'', which employ learnable vectors as pseudo prompt tokens and achieve better performance. Though showing promising prospects, these soft-prompting methods are observed to rely heavily on good initialization to take effect. Unfortunately, obtaining a perfect initialization for soft prompts requires understanding of inner language models working and elaborate design, which is no easy task and has to restart from scratch for each new task. To remedy this, we propose a generalized soft prompting method called MetaPrompting, which adopts the well-recognized model-agnostic meta-learning algorithm to automatically find better prompt initialization that facilitates fast adaptation to new prompting tasks.Extensive experiments show MetaPrompting tackles soft prompt initialization problem and brings significant improvement on four different datasets (over 6 points improvement in accuracy for 1-shot setting), achieving new state-of-the-art performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
An Empirical Study of Foundation Models for Variability-Induced Compilation Errors in Configurable C Code
On a synthetic benchmark of configurable C snippets, GPT-OSS-20B detected affected configurations with 84.7% precision and 52.1% recall and repaired 72.4% of faulty snippets; a smaller real-world study suggests practi...
-
Investigating the Performance of Small Language Models in Detecting Test Smells in Manual Test Cases
Small language models with a targeted prompting scheme detect seven test-smell types in natural-language Ubuntu manual tests, with pass@2 scores of 90-97% across three models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.