REVIEW 3 cited by
Detectability of strongly lensed gravitational waves using model-independent image parameters
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Strong gravitational lensing of gravitational waves (GWs) occurs when the GWs from a compact binary system travel near a massive object. The mismatch between a lensed signal and unlensed templates determines whether lensing can be identified in a particular GW event. For axisymmetric lens models, the lensed signal is traditionally calculated in terms of model-dependent lens parameters such as the lens mass $M_L$ and source position $y$. We propose that it is useful to parameterize this signal instead in terms of model-independent image parameters: the flux ratio $I$ and time delay $\Delta t_d$ between images. The functional dependence of the lensed signal on these image parameters is far simpler, facilitating data analysis for events with modest signal-to-noise ratios. In the geometrical-optics approximation, constraints on $I$ and $\Delta t_d$ can be inverted to constrain $M_L$ and $y$ for any lens model including the point mass (PM) and singular isothermal sphere (SIS) that we consider. We use our model-independent image parameters to determine the detectability of gravitational lensing in GW signals and find that for GW events with signal-to-noise ratios $\rho$ and total mass $M$, lensing should in principle be identifiable for flux ratios $I \gtrsim 2\rho^{-2}$ and time delays $\Delta t_d \gtrsim M^{-1}$.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
The diffraction-lensing interpretation of GW231123 with astrophysical priors
GW231123 is better fit by a lower-mass merger diffracted by an isolated ~1000 M_sun lens, but astrophysical priors and a frequentist rate estimate make this lensing interpretation unlikely.
-
Identifying lensed gravitational waves with physics-informed posterior learning
Fusing a simulation-trained common-source mass posterior with waveform features raises lensed-event detection efficiency from 20.8% to 35.2% at 1% false-positive rate and lowers the SNR for 50% efficiency from 45.3 to 33.5.
-
Parameter estimation of microlensed gravitational waves with Conditional Variational Autoencoders
A conditional variational autoencoder trained on simulated microlensed binary black hole signals estimates lens mass and source offset with well-calibrated posteriors, runs about 10,000 times faster than Bilby, and cu...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.