Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Late Prompt Tuning: A Late Prompt Could Be Better Than Many Prompts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.11292 v2 pith:KZEC76MQ submitted 2022-10-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords prompttuninglatelayermodelperformancepetuningptms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Prompt tuning is a parameter-efficient tuning (PETuning) method for utilizing pre-trained models (PTMs) that simply prepends a soft prompt to the input and only optimizes the prompt to adapt PTMs to downstream tasks. Although it is parameter- and deployment-efficient, its performance still lags behind other state-of-the-art PETuning methods. Besides, the training cost of prompt tuning is not significantly reduced due to the back-propagation through the entire model. Through empirical analyses, we shed some light on the lagging performance of prompt tuning and recognize a trade-off between the propagation distance from label signals to the inserted prompt and the influence of the prompt on model outputs. Further, we present Late Prompt Tuning (LPT) that inserts a late prompt into an intermediate layer of the PTM instead of the input layer or all layers. The late prompt is obtained by a neural prompt generator conditioned on the hidden states before the prompt insertion layer and therefore is instance-dependent. Through extensive experimental results across various tasks and PTMs, we show that LPT can achieve competitive performance to full model tuning and other PETuning methods under both full-data and few-shot scenarios while possessing faster training speed and lower memory cost.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learn from Downstream and Be Yourself in Multimodal Large Language Model Fine-Tuning

    cs.CL 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SPIDER updates only parameters whose fine-tuning gradient importance exceeds their pre-trained weight importance, reducing catastrophic forgetting and improving downstream performance in multimodal LLM fine-tuning.

  2. Survey of different Large Language Model Architectures: Trends, Benchmarks, and Challenges

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional

    A broad but error-prone survey of LLM and MLLM architectures, training methods, benchmarks, and challenges.

Pith tools