REVIEW 4 cited by
Towards the Detection of Diffusion Model Deepfakes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the course of the past few years, diffusion models (DMs) have reached an unprecedented level of visual quality. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the detection of DM-generated images, which is critical to prevent adverse impacts on our society. In contrast, generative adversarial networks (GANs), have been extensively studied from a forensic perspective. In this work, we therefore take the natural next step to evaluate whether previous methods can be used to detect images generated by DMs. Our experiments yield two key findings: (1) state-of-the-art GAN detectors are unable to reliably distinguish real from DM-generated images, but (2) re-training them on DM-generated images allows for almost perfect detection, which remarkably even generalizes to GANs. Together with a feature space analysis, our results lead to the hypothesis that DMs produce fewer detectable artifacts and are thus more difficult to detect compared to GANs. One possible reason for this is the absence of grid-like frequency artifacts in DM-generated images, which are a known weakness of GANs. However, we make the interesting observation that diffusion models tend to underestimate high frequencies, which we attribute to the learning objective.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
AIGI-Holmes: Towards Explainable and Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Multimodal Large Language Models
AIGI-Holmes combines visual expert pretraining, SFT on explanation data, and direct preference optimization to deliver human-verifiable explanations and top detection accuracy on unseen AI generators.
-
Position: AI/ML Deepfake Research is Misaligned with AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (AIG-NCII)
The dominant real-world use of generative-image abuse is non-consensual intimate imagery, yet the AI/ML research field focuses almost exclusively on viewer deception.
-
Evaluating Deepfake Detectors in the Wild
Modern deepfake detectors, evaluated on a new 500,000 image in-the-wild style benchmark built with SimSwap and Inswapper, mostly fail to generalize and degrade under simple image manipulations.
-
Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors
Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.