Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Towards the Detection of Diffusion Model Deepfakes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14571 v4 pith:AZXJITJB submitted 2022-10-26 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords imagesdm-generatedgansdetectiondiffusionartifactsbeendetect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the course of the past few years, diffusion models (DMs) have reached an unprecedented level of visual quality. However, relatively little attention has been paid to the detection of DM-generated images, which is critical to prevent adverse impacts on our society. In contrast, generative adversarial networks (GANs), have been extensively studied from a forensic perspective. In this work, we therefore take the natural next step to evaluate whether previous methods can be used to detect images generated by DMs. Our experiments yield two key findings: (1) state-of-the-art GAN detectors are unable to reliably distinguish real from DM-generated images, but (2) re-training them on DM-generated images allows for almost perfect detection, which remarkably even generalizes to GANs. Together with a feature space analysis, our results lead to the hypothesis that DMs produce fewer detectable artifacts and are thus more difficult to detect compared to GANs. One possible reason for this is the absence of grid-like frequency artifacts in DM-generated images, which are a known weakness of GANs. However, we make the interesting observation that diffusion models tend to underestimate high frequencies, which we attribute to the learning objective.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AIGI-Holmes: Towards Explainable and Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AIGI-Holmes combines visual expert pretraining, SFT on explanation data, and direct preference optimization to deliver human-verifiable explanations and top detection accuracy on unseen AI generators.

  2. Position: AI/ML Deepfake Research is Misaligned with AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (AIG-NCII)

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The dominant real-world use of generative-image abuse is non-consensual intimate imagery, yet the AI/ML research field focuses almost exclusively on viewer deception.

  3. Evaluating Deepfake Detectors in the Wild

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Modern deepfake detectors, evaluated on a new 500,000 image in-the-wild style benchmark built with SimSwap and Inswapper, mostly fail to generalize and degrade under simple image manipulations.

  4. Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.

Pith tools