REVIEW 2 cited by
Concrete Score Matching: Generalized Score Matching for Discrete Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Representing probability distributions by the gradient of their density functions has proven effective in modeling a wide range of continuous data modalities. However, this representation is not applicable in discrete domains where the gradient is undefined. To this end, we propose an analogous score function called the "Concrete score", a generalization of the (Stein) score for discrete settings. Given a predefined neighborhood structure, the Concrete score of any input is defined by the rate of change of the probabilities with respect to local directional changes of the input. This formulation allows us to recover the (Stein) score in continuous domains when measuring such changes by the Euclidean distance, while using the Manhattan distance leads to our novel score function in discrete domains. Finally, we introduce a new framework to learn such scores from samples called Concrete Score Matching (CSM), and propose an efficient training objective to scale our approach to high dimensions. Empirically, we demonstrate the efficacy of CSM on density estimation tasks on a mixture of synthetic, tabular, and high-dimensional image datasets, and demonstrate that it performs favorably relative to existing baselines for modeling discrete data.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Discrete Markov Bridge
Discrete Markov Bridge learns the forward rate matrix and the reverse score in a continuous-time Markov chain, achieving BPC 1.38 on Text8 and FID 11.63 on CIFAR-10.
-
Discrete State Diffusion Models: A Sample Complexity Perspective
Claims the first Õ(ε⁻²) sample-complexity bound for discrete-state diffusion, but the zero-approximation-error, optimization-error, and hardness lemmas carrying the proof are internally broken.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.