Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Knowledge Graph Generation From Text

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.10511 v1 pith:OFO4IIGB submitted 2022-11-18 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords generationgraphconstructionexistingknowledgemodeloverallperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this work we propose a novel end-to-end multi-stage Knowledge Graph (KG) generation system from textual inputs, separating the overall process into two stages. The graph nodes are generated first using pretrained language model, followed by a simple edge construction head, enabling efficient KG extraction from the text. For each stage we consider several architectural choices that can be used depending on the available training resources. We evaluated the model on a recent WebNLG 2020 Challenge dataset, matching the state-of-the-art performance on text-to-RDF generation task, as well as on New York Times (NYT) and a large-scale TekGen datasets, showing strong overall performance, outperforming the existing baselines. We believe that the proposed system can serve as a viable KG construction alternative to the existing linearization or sampling-based graph generation approaches. Our code can be found at https://github.com/IBM/Grapher

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Systematic Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Repair with Large Language Models

    cs.DB 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A systematic VIO-based framework generates SHACL-violating graph test cases and shows that LLM repair systems perform best with concise, violation-focused prompts.

Pith tools