REVIEW 2 cited by
Algorithmic progress in computer vision
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate algorithmic progress in image classification on ImageNet, perhaps the most well-known test bed for computer vision. We estimate a model, informed by work on neural scaling laws, and infer a decomposition of progress into the scaling of compute, data, and algorithms. Using Shapley values to attribute performance improvements, we find that algorithmic improvements have been roughly as important as the scaling of compute for progress computer vision. Our estimates indicate that algorithmic innovations mostly take the form of compute-augmenting algorithmic advances (which enable researchers to get better performance from less compute), not data-augmenting algorithmic advances. We find that compute-augmenting algorithmic advances are made at a pace more than twice as fast as the rate usually associated with Moore's law. In particular, we estimate that compute-augmenting innovations halve compute requirements every nine months (95\% confidence interval: 4 to 25 months).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond Tokens: Enhancing RTL Quality Estimation via Structural Graph Learning
StructRTL uses self-supervised learning on control data flow graphs, plus knowledge distillation from post-mapping netlists, to beat prior LLM-based methods for predicting circuit area and delay from RTL code on a 13,...
-
Literature Review Of Multi-Agent Debate For Problem-Solving
A literature review concludes that multi-agent LLM debate helps up to a task-dependent point, after which extra agents and rounds add cost without reliable gains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.