Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.10450 v2 pith:QH35U777 submitted 2022-12-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords datagpt-3annotationannotatortasksmodeloutputperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data annotation is the process of labeling data that could be used to train machine learning models. Having high-quality annotation is crucial, as it allows the model to learn the relationship between the input data and the desired output. GPT-3, a large-scale language model developed by OpenAI, has demonstrated impressive zero- and few-shot performance on a wide range of NLP tasks. It is therefore natural to wonder whether it can be used to effectively annotate data for NLP tasks. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GPT-3 as a data annotator by comparing it with traditional data annotation methods and analyzing its output on a range of tasks. Through this analysis, we aim to provide insight into the potential of GPT-3 as a general-purpose data annotator in NLP.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What Matters in LLM-generated Data: Diversity and Its Effect on Model Fine-Tuning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Moderately diverse LLM-generated data can improve fine-tuned model performance in low-data settings when distribution shift is minimal, while high diversity or large distribution shift hurts.

  2. Learning to Select Visual In-Context Demonstrations

    cs.LG 2026-03 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A Dueling-DQN agent selects visual in-context demonstrations and outperforms kNN retrieval on objective regression benchmarks but not on subjective preference tasks, per the paper's main table.

Pith tools