Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Trustworthy Social Bias Measurement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.11672 v1 pith:HKDIF5TN submitted 2022-12-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords measuresbiassocialtrustmeasurementtestingdesignevidence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How do we design measures of social bias that we trust? While prior work has introduced several measures, no measure has gained widespread trust: instead, mounting evidence argues we should distrust these measures. In this work, we design bias measures that warrant trust based on the cross-disciplinary theory of measurement modeling. To combat the frequently fuzzy treatment of social bias in NLP, we explicitly define social bias, grounded in principles drawn from social science research. We operationalize our definition by proposing a general bias measurement framework DivDist, which we use to instantiate 5 concrete bias measures. To validate our measures, we propose a rigorous testing protocol with 8 testing criteria (e.g. predictive validity: do measures predict biases in US employment?). Through our testing, we demonstrate considerable evidence to trust our measures, showing they overcome conceptual, technical, and empirical deficiencies present in prior measures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gaps Between Research and Practice When Measuring Representational Harms Caused by LLM-Based Systems

    cs.CY 2024-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Practitioners face four types of challenges using public instruments to measure representational harms: instrument validity and specificity, practical measurement constraints, benchmark trust issues, and harm-specific...

Pith tools