Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Supporting Co-Adaptive Machine Teaching through Human Concept Learning and Cognitive Theories

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.16561 v2 pith:225QOO7H submitted 2024-09-25 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords datalearningusersconceptmachinemochaalignmentannotate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

An important challenge in interactive machine learning, particularly in subjective or ambiguous domains, is fostering bi-directional alignment between humans and models. Users teach models their concept definition through data labeling, while refining their own understandings throughout the process. To facilitate this, we introduce MOCHA, an interactive machine learning tool informed by two theories of human concept learning and cognition. First, it utilizes a neuro-symbolic pipeline to support Variation Theory-based counterfactual data generation. By asking users to annotate counterexamples that are syntactically and semantically similar to already-annotated data but predicted to have different labels, the system can learn more effectively while helping users understand the model and reflect on their own label definitions. Second, MOCHA uses Structural Alignment Theory to present groups of counterexamples, helping users comprehend alignable differences between data items and annotate them in batch. We validated MOCHA's effectiveness and usability through a lab study with 18 participants.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DxHF: Providing High-Quality Human Feedback for LLM Alignment via Interactive Decomposition

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Breaking LLM responses into linked, relevance-ranked claims improves human pairwise preference accuracy by roughly 5% versus a standard text interface in a crowdsourcing study, with larger gains for uncertain annotators.

  2. VideoDiff: Human-AI Video Co-Creation with Alternatives

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Aligned timeline and transcript views for multiple AI-generated video edits let creators compare and refine alternatives roughly twice as fast, with lower workload and higher final-video satisfaction, in a within-subj...

Pith tools