Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.07069 v2 pith:23AVWOFD submitted 2023-01-17 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords promptingexamplesprompttranslationperformancedatamachinemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Research on prompting has shown excellent performance with little or even no supervised training across many tasks. However, prompting for machine translation is still under-explored in the literature. We fill this gap by offering a systematic study on prompting strategies for translation, examining various factors for prompt template and demonstration example selection. We further explore the use of monolingual data and the feasibility of cross-lingual, cross-domain, and sentence-to-document transfer learning in prompting. Extensive experiments with GLM-130B (Zeng et al., 2022) as the testbed show that 1) the number and the quality of prompt examples matter, where using suboptimal examples degenerates translation; 2) several features of prompt examples, such as semantic similarity, show significant Spearman correlation with their prompting performance; yet, none of the correlations are strong enough; 3) using pseudo parallel prompt examples constructed from monolingual data via zero-shot prompting could improve translation; and 4) improved performance is achievable by transferring knowledge from prompt examples selected in other settings. We finally provide an analysis on the model outputs and discuss several problems that prompting still suffers from.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 68 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Prompt Scope and Demonstration Similarity in Local LLM Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Prompt scope and demonstration selection materially change local LLM translation quality and compliance, and dedicated MT systems still outperform them overall.

  2. LLMs are Introvert

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A psychology-inspired prompting method (SIP-CoT with emotion-guided memory) makes LLM agents reproduce human-like attitudes and behaviors more closely in social simulations, but the evaluation lacks error bars, a name...

Pith tools