REVIEW 1 cited by
Lateralized Learning for Multi-Class Visual Classification Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The majority of computer vision algorithms fail to find higher-order (abstract) patterns in an image so are not robust against adversarial attacks, unlike human lateralized vision. Deep learning considers each input pixel in a homogeneous manner such that different parts of a ``locality-sensitive hashing table'' are often not connected, meaning higher-order patterns are not discovered. Hence these systems are not robust against noisy, irrelevant, and redundant data, resulting in the wrong prediction being made with high confidence. Conversely, vertebrate brains afford heterogeneous knowledge representation through lateralization, enabling modular learning at different levels of abstraction. This work aims to verify the effectiveness, scalability, and robustness of a lateralized approach to real-world problems that contain noisy, irrelevant, and redundant data. The experimental results of multi-class (200 classes) image classification show that the novel system effectively learns knowledge representation at multiple levels of abstraction making it more robust than other state-of-the-art techniques. Crucially, the novel lateralized system outperformed all the state-of-the-art deep learning-based systems for the classification of normal and adversarial images by 19.05% - 41.02% and 1.36% - 49.22%, respectively. Findings demonstrate the value of heterogeneous and lateralized learning for computer vision applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Enhancing Object Detection Accuracy in Autonomous Vehicles Using Synthetic Data
Adding 2,139 Unity synthetic images to 4,658 real images improved YOLO detection metrics on a held-out test set, but no control for the larger training set means the gain cannot be attributed to synthetic data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.