Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Solving High-Dimensional PDEs with Latent Spectral Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.12664 v3 pith:A7LKXXM5 submitted 2023-01-30 cs.LG physics.comp-ph

classification cs.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords pdesspacehigh-dimensionallatentmodelsspectralcoordinatelearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep models have achieved impressive progress in solving partial differential equations (PDEs). A burgeoning paradigm is learning neural operators to approximate the input-output mappings of PDEs. While previous deep models have explored the multiscale architectures and various operator designs, they are limited to learning the operators as a whole in the coordinate space. In real physical science problems, PDEs are complex coupled equations with numerical solvers relying on discretization into high-dimensional coordinate space, which cannot be precisely approximated by a single operator nor efficiently learned due to the curse of dimensionality. We present Latent Spectral Models (LSM) toward an efficient and precise solver for high-dimensional PDEs. Going beyond the coordinate space, LSM enables an attention-based hierarchical projection network to reduce the high-dimensional data into a compact latent space in linear time. Inspired by classical spectral methods in numerical analysis, we design a neural spectral block to solve PDEs in the latent space that approximates complex input-output mappings via learning multiple basis operators, enjoying nice theoretical guarantees for convergence and approximation. Experimentally, LSM achieves consistent state-of-the-art and yields a relative gain of 11.5% averaged on seven benchmarks covering both solid and fluid physics. Code is available at https://github.com/thuml/Latent-Spectral-Models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Mamba Neural Operators

    cs.LG 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AMO builds adaptive Takenaka-Malmquist bases inside a Mamba state-space model for PDE operator learning, but the claimed equivalence to adaptive Fourier decomposition is not supported by the implemented recurrence.

  2. LaDEEP: A Deep Learning-based Surrogate Model for Large Deformation of Elastic-Plastic Solids

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage Transformer surrogate trained on finite element data predicts stretch-bending final shapes with about 0.17 mm mean absolute distance and over 10,000 times speedup versus FEM.

  3. Ocean-E2E: Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Global Forecasting of Extreme Marine Heatwaves with End-to-End Neural Assimilation

    physics.geo-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ocean-E2E, a hybrid physics-and-AI model with neural data assimilation, forecasts global marine heatwaves up to 40 days ahead with reported skill above ECMWF's S2S system.

  4. Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential Equations

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LaMO replaces attention in latent-token neural operators with bidirectional state-space models and reports consistent accuracy gains on six PDE benchmarks.

  5. Factorized Neural Operators Decompose Dynamic and Persistent Responses

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    FaNO splits spectral neural operators into a dynamic branch and a static global-scaled persistent branch, improving weather, fluid, and geometry benchmarks.

Pith tools