Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AIROGS: Artificial Intelligence for RObust Glaucoma Screening Challenge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.01738 v2 pith:D32YAZQV submitted 2023-02-03 eess.IV cs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.LG
keywords glaucomascreeningrobustartificialchallengeimagesintelligenceairogs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The early detection of glaucoma is essential in preventing visual impairment. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to analyze color fundus photographs (CFPs) in a cost-effective manner, making glaucoma screening more accessible. While AI models for glaucoma screening from CFPs have shown promising results in laboratory settings, their performance decreases significantly in real-world scenarios due to the presence of out-of-distribution and low-quality images. To address this issue, we propose the Artificial Intelligence for Robust Glaucoma Screening (AIROGS) challenge. This challenge includes a large dataset of around 113,000 images from about 60,000 patients and 500 different screening centers, and encourages the development of algorithms that are robust to ungradable and unexpected input data. We evaluated solutions from 14 teams in this paper, and found that the best teams performed similarly to a set of 20 expert ophthalmologists and optometrists. The highest-scoring team achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99) for detecting ungradable images on-the-fly. Additionally, many of the algorithms showed robust performance when tested on three other publicly available datasets. These results demonstrate the feasibility of robust AI-enabled glaucoma screening.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shadow defense against gradient inversion attack in federated learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A shadow-model-based defense adds sample-specific noise to medical images in federated learning, weakening gradient inversion attacks while keeping model accuracy near baseline.

  2. Automated Multi-label Classification of Eleven Retinal Diseases: A Benchmark of Modern Architectures and a Meta-Ensemble on a Large Synthetic Dataset

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark of six neural networks plus a stacked ensemble shows that training on synthetic fundus images transfers to real retinal disease classification, with macro-AUC up to 0.88 externally.

Pith tools