REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking Deepart Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Deepfake technologies have been blurring the boundaries between the real and unreal, likely resulting in malicious events. By leveraging newly emerged deepfake technologies, deepfake researchers have been making a great upending to create deepfake artworks (deeparts), which are further closing the gap between reality and fantasy. To address potentially appeared ethics questions, this paper establishes a deepart detection database (DDDB) that consists of a set of high-quality conventional art images (conarts) and five sets of deepart images generated by five state-of-the-art deepfake models. This database enables us to explore once-for-all deepart detection and continual deepart detection. For the two new problems, we suggest four benchmark evaluations and four families of solutions on the constructed DDDB. The comprehensive study demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed solutions on the established benchmark dataset, which is capable of paving a way to more interesting directions of deepart detection. The constructed benchmark dataset and the source code will be made publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DFBench: Benchmarking Deepfake Image Detection Capability of Large Multimodal Models
DFBench adds a 540,000-image benchmark with 12 modern generators, partial edits, and distorted real images, and its three-model LMM ensemble, MoA-DF, reaches near-perfect recall on its own test split.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.