Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Magnushammer: A Transformer-Based Approach to Premise Selection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.04488 v3 pith:GFT2NPYE submitted 2023-03-08 cs.LG cs.AIcs.LO

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.LO
keywords premiseselectionmagnushammerprooftheoremapproachautomateddataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to premise selection, a crucial reasoning task in automated theorem proving. Traditionally, symbolic methods that rely on extensive domain knowledge and engineering effort are applied to this task. In contrast, this work demonstrates that contrastive training with the transformer architecture can achieve higher-quality retrieval of relevant premises, without the engineering overhead. Our method, Magnushammer, outperforms the most advanced and widely used automation tool in interactive theorem proving called Sledgehammer. On the PISA and miniF2F benchmarks Magnushammer achieves $59.5\%$ (against $38.3\%$) and $34.0\%$ (against $20.9\%$) success rates, respectively. By combining \method with a language-model-based automated theorem prover, we further improve the state-of-the-art proof success rate from $57.0\%$ to $71.0\%$ on the PISA benchmark using $4$x fewer parameters. Moreover, we develop and open source a novel dataset for premise selection, containing textual representations of (proof state, relevant premise) pairs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest available premise selection dataset, and the first one for the Isabelle proof assistant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 8 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. PPDL: LLM-Based Flows as Probabilistic Programs

    cs.LG 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    PPDL adds factor-based probabilistic inference to a prompt programming language, turning multi-step LLM flows into distributions over execution traces with pluggable inference engines.

  2. Lean-auto: An Interface between Lean 4 and Automated Theorem Provers

    cs.LO 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Lean-auto translates Lean 4 goals into higher-order logic for external theorem provers, and on Mathlib4 it solves 36.6% of 149,142 test theorems with Duper, ahead of existing tactics.

  3. Solving Formal Math Problems by Decomposition and Iterative Reflection

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An agent that decomposes Lean 4 goals into subproblems and iteratively repairs proofs achieves a 95.9% pass rate on miniF2F-test using a stock Gemini model.

  4. Clarifying Before Reasoning: A Coq Prover with Structural Context

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Enriching LLM theorem-proving prompts with Coq's internal type representations and natural-language explanations raises proof success from 21.8% to 45.8%, surpassing Graph2Tac's 33.2%.

Pith tools