Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2303.06247 v4 pith:5PVWDQCF submitted 2023-03-10 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords llm-gropcommonsenseknowledgeobjectrearrangementarrangementslanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-object rearrangement is a crucial skill for service robots, and commonsense reasoning is frequently needed in this process. However, achieving commonsense arrangements requires knowledge about objects, which is hard to transfer to robots. Large language models (LLMs) are one potential source of this knowledge, but they do not naively capture information about plausible physical arrangements of the world. We propose LLM-GROP, which uses prompting to extract commonsense knowledge about semantically valid object configurations from an LLM and instantiates them with a task and motion planner in order to generalize to varying scene geometry. LLM-GROP allows us to go from natural-language commands to human-aligned object rearrangement in varied environments. Based on human evaluations, our approach achieves the highest rating while outperforming competitive baselines in terms of success rate while maintaining comparable cumulative action costs. Finally, we demonstrate a practical implementation of LLM-GROP on a mobile manipulator in real-world scenarios. Supplementary materials are available at: https://sites.google.com/view/llm-grop

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Weights or Skills? A Survey of Robot-Learning Techniques: from Action-Predicting Weights to Robots that Write their Own Skills

    cs.RO 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A taxonomy of robot learning on a weights-versus-skills axis, with a five-rung self-improvement ladder whose top cell (feedback plus memory plus search) holds only a few recent systems.

  2. RoboMatrix: A Skill-centric Hierarchical Framework for Scalable Robot Task Planning and Execution in Open-World

    cs.RO 2024-11 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A skill-centric hierarchical framework with a unified vision-language-action model executes new tasks by recombining eight meta-skills, reporting up to 50 percentage points higher success than task-centric baselines.

  3. Tabletop Object Rearrangement: Structure, Complexity, and Efficient Combinatorial Search-Based Solutions

    cs.RO 2024-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Running-buffer minimization for tabletop rearrangement is NP-hard, can require Ω(√n) buffers even for identical cylinders in the worst case, and exact search algorithms scale to over 100 objects.

Pith tools