REVIEW 4 cited by
Double Descent Demystified: Identifying, Interpreting & Ablating the Sources of a Deep Learning Puzzle
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Double descent is a surprising phenomenon in machine learning, in which as the number of model parameters grows relative to the number of data, test error drops as models grow ever larger into the highly overparameterized (data undersampled) regime. This drop in test error flies against classical learning theory on overfitting and has arguably underpinned the success of large models in machine learning. This non-monotonic behavior of test loss depends on the number of data, the dimensionality of the data and the number of model parameters. Here, we briefly describe double descent, then provide an explanation of why double descent occurs in an informal and approachable manner, requiring only familiarity with linear algebra and introductory probability. We provide visual intuition using polynomial regression, then mathematically analyze double descent with ordinary linear regression and identify three interpretable factors that, when simultaneously all present, together create double descent. We demonstrate that double descent occurs on real data when using ordinary linear regression, then demonstrate that double descent does not occur when any of the three factors are ablated. We use this understanding to shed light on recent observations in nonlinear models concerning superposition and double descent. Code is publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Deep learning inference with the Event Horizon Telescope II. The Zingularity framework for Bayesian artificial neural networks
Bayesian neural networks trained on synthetic EHT observations of Sgr A* and M87* recover spin and magnetic state well in cross-code tests, but give overconfident wrong estimates for temperature ratio and inclination ...
-
Black hole/quantum machine learning correspondence
The authors identify the black hole Page time with the interpolation threshold of quantum linear regression, linking information recovery to double descent through the Marchenko-Pastur law.
-
Large Language Models and Emergence: A Complex Systems Perspective
A perspective paper arguing that LLM emergence claims are incomplete without evidence of internal coarse-grained representations, and that LLMs have not shown emergent intelligence.
-
Approach to Finding a Robust Deep Learning Model
A robustness measure based on the spread of test losses across independently trained instances, plus a pruning algorithm, selects stable small CNNs for calorimeter energy and position reconstruction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.