REVIEW 4 cited by
Invisible Higgs from forward muons at a muon collider
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We propose to probe the Higgs boson decay to invisible particles at a muon collider by observing the forward muons that are produced in association with the Higgs in the Z-boson fusion channel. An excellent sensitivity is possible in line of principle, owing to the large number of produced Higgs bosons, provided a forward muon detector is installed. We find that the resolution on the measurement of the muon energy and angle will be the main factor limiting the actual sensitivity. This poses tight requirements on the forward muon detector design.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
The Neutrino Slice at Muon Colliders
Beam-induced neutrinos at a muon collider would yield around 10^11 interactions per year in the main detector, enabling precision electroweak and neutrino measurements.
-
Neutrino-Portal Dark Matter Detection Prospects at a Future Muon Collider
A 10 kg forward neutrino detector at a 3 TeV muon collider could probe neutrinophilic scalar mediators down to couplings that reach thermal freeze-out and freeze-in dark matter relic targets.
-
Vector Portals at Future Lepton Colliders
Future lepton colliders could probe dark photon and L_mu-L_tau vector portals with one to two orders of magnitude better sensitivity than current constraints across masses from tens of GeV to a few TeV.
-
Electroweak Symmetry Restoration and Radiation Amplitude Zeros
The paper defines a quantitative measure of electroweak symmetry restoration, δ = M_W/2E, and proposes W±γ, W±Z, and W±H cross-section ratios near radiation amplitude zeros as new high-energy collider observables for ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.