Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing with HSC and SDSS using the Emulator Based Halo Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.00704 v3 pith:CISBIR7M submitted 2023-04-03 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords sigmamodeldeltaphoto-analysiscosmologygalaxiesgalaxy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present cosmology results from a blinded joint analysis of cosmic shear, $\xi_{\pm}(\vartheta)$, galaxy-galaxy weak lensing, $\Delta\!\Sigma(R)$, and projected galaxy clustering, $w_{\rm p}(R)$, measured from the Hyper Suprime-Cam three-year (HSC-Y3) shape catalog and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR11 spectroscopic galaxy catalog - a 3$\times$2pt cosmology analysis. We define luminosity-cut samples of SDSS galaxies to serve as the tracers of $w_{\rm p}$ and as the lens samples for $\Delta\!\Sigma$ in three spectroscopic redshift bins spanning the range $0.15<z<0.7$. For the $\xi_{\pm}$ and $\Delta\!\Sigma$ measurements, we use a single source sample over 416 deg$^2$, selected from HSC-Y3 based on having photometric redshifts (photo-$z$) greater than 0.75. For cosmological parameter inference, we use Dark Emulator combined with a halo occupation distribution prescription to model $w_{\rm p}$ and $\Delta\!\Sigma$ down to quasi-nonlinear scales. In our baseline analysis we employ an uninformative flat prior of the residual photo-$z$ error to model a residual bias in the mean redshift of HSC source galaxies. We obtain a robust constraint on the cosmological parameters for the flat $\Lambda$CDM model: $S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}=0.763^{+0.040}_{-0.036}$ (68% C.I.), or the best-constrained parameter given by $S'_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.22}=0.721\pm 0.028$, determined with about 4% fractional precision. Our HSC-Y3 data exhibits about 2.5$\sigma$ tension with the Planck inferred $S_8$ value for the $\Lambda$CDM model, and hints at a non-zero residual photo-$z$ bias implying that the true mean redshift of the HSC galaxies at $z\gtrsim 0.75$ is higher than that implied by the original photo-$z$ estimates.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cosmology and Source Redshift Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Tomographic Weak Lensing with HSC Y3 and SDSS using the Point-Mass Correction Model

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Galaxy clustering plus weak lensing from HSC Y3 and SDSS gives S8 = 0.780 ± 0.030 and lensing-only redshift offsets Δz3 = -0.112, Δz4 = -0.185.

  2. Forecasting the Impact of Source Galaxy Photometric Redshift Uncertainties on the LSST $3\times2$pt Analysis

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Fisher forecast code for LSST 3x2pt and cosmic shear shows photo-z parameter marginalization inflates contours 2 to 6 times, and maps the most impactful photo-z parameters for each cosmological parameter.

  3. Signatures of Modified Gravity on Linear Scales in a Dynamical Dark Energy Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using Planck, DESI, supernovae, and redshift-space distortions, the authors infer that modified gravity, if present, must act only below ~30 Mpc and cannot modify the large scales previously considered.

  4. Forecasting the E_G measurements from the photometric and spectroscopic surveys of Chinese Space Station Survey Telescope (CSST)

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CSST forecasts E_G to 3–9% over 0<z<1.2, with the modified-gravity parameter Σ0 constrained to ~5% if β errors follow an assumed external forecast.

  5. Modelling Galaxy Clustering and Tomographic Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing with HSC Y3 and SDSS using the Point-Mass Correction Model and Redshift Self-Calibration

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Combining SDSS clustering with HSC Y3 galaxy-galaxy lensing, with a point-mass correction down to 2 Mpc/h, gives S8 = 0.804 ± 0.051 and self-calibrated redshift shifts for the two highest source bins.

Pith tools