Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Brief Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.01543 v1 pith:OOGL5AOK submitted 2023-04-04 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords methodshealthcaremodelsapplicationsreviewchallengesdomainexplainability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

XAI refers to the techniques and methods for building AI applications which assist end users to interpret output and predictions of AI models. Black box AI applications in high-stakes decision-making situations, such as medical domain have increased the demand for transparency and explainability since wrong predictions may have severe consequences. Model explainability and interpretability are vital successful deployment of AI models in healthcare practices. AI applications' underlying reasoning needs to be transparent to clinicians in order to gain their trust. This paper presents a systematic review of XAI aspects and challenges in the healthcare domain. The primary goals of this study are to review various XAI methods, their challenges, and related machine learning models in healthcare. The methods are discussed under six categories: Features-oriented methods, global methods, concept models, surrogate models, local pixel-based methods, and human-centric methods. Most importantly, the paper explores XAI role in healthcare problems to clarify its necessity in safety-critical applications. The paper intends to establish a comprehensive understanding of XAI-related applications in the healthcare field by reviewing the related experimental results. To facilitate future research for filling research gaps, the importance of XAI models from different viewpoints and their limitations are investigated.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Visual-Conversational Interface for Evidence-Based Explanation of Diabetes Risk Prediction

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A visual-conversational diabetes risk tool grounded in scientific evidence was rated by 30 healthcare professionals as improving understanding and calibrating trust.

  2. MedOrch: Medical Diagnosis with Tool-Augmented Reasoning Agents for Flexible Extensibility

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    MedOrch is a modular framework in which LLMs call medical tools to answer clinical questions; its headline results on Alzheimer's, chest X-ray, and VQA benchmarks are weakened by best-of-five scoring.

Pith tools