REVIEW 5 cited by
Is ChatGPT a Highly Fluent Grammatical Error Correction System? A Comprehensive Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
ChatGPT, a large-scale language model based on the advanced GPT-3.5 architecture, has shown remarkable potential in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, there is currently a dearth of comprehensive study exploring its potential in the area of Grammatical Error Correction (GEC). To showcase its capabilities in GEC, we design zero-shot chain-of-thought (CoT) and few-shot CoT settings using in-context learning for ChatGPT. Our evaluation involves assessing ChatGPT's performance on five official test sets in three different languages, along with three document-level GEC test sets in English. Our experimental results and human evaluations demonstrate that ChatGPT has excellent error detection capabilities and can freely correct errors to make the corrected sentences very fluent, possibly due to its over-correction tendencies and not adhering to the principle of minimal edits. Additionally, its performance in non-English and low-resource settings highlights its potential in multilingual GEC tasks. However, further analysis of various types of errors at the document-level has shown that ChatGPT cannot effectively correct agreement, coreference, tense errors across sentences, and cross-sentence boundary errors.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Benchmarking the Detection of LLMs-Generated Modern Chinese Poetry
A new modern Chinese poetry detection benchmark shows most current AI-text detectors are unreliable, particularly when LLMs imitate a human style.
-
APIO: Automatic Prompt Induction and Optimization for Grammatical Error Correction and Text Simplification
APIO automatically induces and optimizes instruction-list prompts for grammatical error correction and text simplification, reporting improved scores over prior prompt-based methods on BEA-2019 and ASSET.
-
Adapting LLMs for Minimal-edit Grammatical Error Correction
A lower learning rate on correct examples after training on errors lets Gemma 2 set a new single-model SOTA on BEA-test, aided by adding unedited pairs.
-
Which Prompting Technique Should I Use? An Empirical Investigation of Prompting Techniques for Software Engineering Tasks
Across ten software engineering tasks and four LLMs, no prompting technique wins consistently; ES-KNN is best on many tasks, some techniques underperform the baseline, and USC is best for code QA and code generation.
-
Harnessing Rule-Based Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Grammatical Error Correction
Applying GRPO with a rule-based, reference-match reward to a Qwen3-8B model after reasoning-augmented SFT achieves state-of-the-art F0.5 on Chinese GEC benchmark FCGEC and improves recall.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.