REVIEW 3 cited by
Summary of ChatGPT-Related Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of ChatGPT-related (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) research, state-of-the-art large language models (LLM) from the GPT series, and their prospective applications across diverse domains. Indeed, key innovations such as large-scale pre-training that captures knowledge across the entire world wide web, instruction fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) have played significant roles in enhancing LLMs' adaptability and performance. We performed an in-depth analysis of 194 relevant papers on arXiv, encompassing trend analysis, word cloud representation, and distribution analysis across various application domains. The findings reveal a significant and increasing interest in ChatGPT-related research, predominantly centered on direct natural language processing applications, while also demonstrating considerable potential in areas ranging from education and history to mathematics, medicine, and physics. This study endeavors to furnish insights into ChatGPT's capabilities, potential implications, ethical concerns, and offer direction for future advancements in this field.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
PADAM: Parallel averaged Adam reduces the error for stochastic optimization in scientific machine learning
PADAM runs K differently averaged Adam trajectories in parallel, selects the one with the smallest test error, and achieves the best optimization error in nearly all of 13 tested scientific machine learning problems w...
-
Concealment of Intent: A Game-Theoretic Analysis
Intent-hiding adversarial prompting that mixes malicious intents with innocuous skills bypasses prompt and response filters, and a game-theoretic analysis quantifies the attacker's scaling advantage.
-
Automated Consistency Analysis of LLMs
LLMs frequently produce inconsistent answers to repeated cybersecurity questions, but the paper's validation methods rely on the models judging their own and each other's responses.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.