REVIEW 4 cited by
Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Both humans and large language models are able to learn language without explicit structural supervision. What inductive biases make this learning possible? We address this fundamental cognitive question by leveraging transformer language models: we inject inductive bias into language models by pretraining on formally-structured data, and then evaluate the biased learners' ability to learn typologically-diverse natural languages. Our experimental setup creates a testbed for hypotheses about inductive bias in human language learning. We investigate the effect of injecting models with three types of inductive bias: 1) recursive, hierarchical processing, 2) crossing token-token relationships that can't be modeled by context-free grammars, and 3) a Zipfian power-law vocabulary distribution. We show that non-context-free relationships form the best inductive biases. Our study leverages the capabilities of transformer models to run controlled language learning experiments that are not possible to run on humans, and surfaces hypotheses about the structures that facilitate language learning in both humans and machines.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Rethinking Memorization Measures and their Implications in Large Language Models
Contextual memorization, defined by comparing a string's training loss against the best loss without training on that string, is stricter than counterfactual memorization and suggests that zero-memorization optimal le...
-
Transformers Pretrained on Procedural Data Contain Modular Structures for Algorithmic Reasoning
Different procedural pretraining tasks create complementary, transferable structures in a transformer's attention and MLP weights, and structures from different tasks can be combined into one initialization.
-
Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up Language Models with Abstract Data
A short warm-up on procedural data (brackets, sorting, sets) makes language models more accurate and more data-efficient on language, code, and informal math.
-
Transfer of Structural Knowledge from Synthetic Languages
A new synthetic language, flat_shuffle, transfers more structure to English fine-tuning than earlier synthetic bracket languages, though still far short of training on English from scratch.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.