Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Origin Tracing and Detecting of LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.14072 v1 pith:B4IPGLGY submitted 2023-04-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsorigintracetracingdetectdetectingmethodmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The extraordinary performance of large language models (LLMs) heightens the importance of detecting whether the context is generated by an AI system. More importantly, while more and more companies and institutions release their LLMs, the origin can be hard to trace. Since LLMs are heading towards the time of AGI, similar to the origin tracing in anthropology, it is of great importance to trace the origin of LLMs. In this paper, we first raise the concern of the origin tracing of LLMs and propose an effective method to trace and detect AI-generated contexts. We introduce a novel algorithm that leverages the contrastive features between LLMs and extracts model-wise features to trace the text origins. Our proposed method works under both white-box and black-box settings therefore can be widely generalized to detect various LLMs.(e.g. can be generalized to detect GPT-3 models without the GPT-3 models). Also, our proposed method requires only limited data compared with the supervised learning methods and can be extended to trace new-coming model origins. We construct extensive experiments to examine whether we can trace the origins of given texts. We provide valuable observations based on the experimental results, such as the difficulty level of AI origin tracing, and the AI origin similarities, and call for ethical concerns of LLM providers. We are releasing all codes and data as a toolkit and benchmark for future AI origin tracing and detecting studies. \footnote{We are releasing all available resource at \url{https://github.com/OpenLMLab/}.}

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Show Me How You Reason and I'll Tell You Who You Are: Reasoning Graphs for Robust LLM Authorship Attribution

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reasoning graphs extracted by an argument-mining pipeline let a GNN attribute LLM-generated essays to the correct model family with more robustness to paraphrasing/backtranslation and better cross-version generalizati...

  2. When Detection Fails: The Power of Fine-Tuned Models to Generate Human-Like Social Media Text

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned LLMs generate social media text that evades state-of-the-art detectors and human readers, dropping detection accuracy from up to 99.9% to near chance.

  3. Measuring Human Involvement in AI-Generated Text: A Case Study on Academic Writing

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Human involvement in AI-generated academic text can be estimated continuously by training a RoBERTa regressor on BERTScore-derived labels, outperforming binary detectors on a new synthetic dataset.

  4. Traceable TTS: Toward Watermark-Free TTS with Strong Traceability

    eess.AS 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A joint training loop makes an F5-TTS model produce audio that a paired wav2vec 2.0/LCNN discriminator can recognize, enabling watermark-free attribution; however, the reported generalization gain is not isolated from...

Pith tools