REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards a better labeling process for network security datasets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Most network security datasets do not have comprehensive label assignment criteria, hindering the evaluation of the datasets, the training of models, the results obtained, the comparison with other methods, and the evaluation in real-life scenarios. There is no labeling ontology nor tools to help assign the labels, resulting in most analyzed datasets assigning labels in files or directory names. This paper addresses the problem of having a better labeling process by (i) reviewing the needs of stakeholders of the datasets, from creators to model users, (ii) presenting a new ontology of label assignment, (iii) presenting a new tool for assigning structured labels for Zeek network flows based on the ontology, and (iv) studying the differences between generating labels and consuming labels in real-life scenarios. We conclude that a process for structured label assignment is paramount for advancing research in network security and that the new ontology-based label assignation rules should be published as an artifact of every dataset.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Labeling NIDS Rules with MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: Machine Learning vs. Large Language Models
On a dataset of 973 Snort rules, traditional ML models (SVM, F1 up to 0.87) outperformed ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini (best F1 0.62) at labeling rules with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.