Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Ram pressure stripping in the EAGLE simulation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.03758 v2 pith:BBMKHSIE submitted 2023-05-05 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords strippinganalyticmathrmpressuregalaxymodelssimulationodot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Ram pressure stripping of satellite galaxies is thought to be a ubiquitous process in galaxy clusters, and a growing number of observations reveal satellites at different stages of stripping. However, in order to determine the fate of any individual galaxy, we turn to predictions from either simulations or analytic models. It is not well-determined whether simulations and analytic models agree in their predictions, nor the causes of disagreement. Here we investigate ram pressure stripping in the reference EAGLE hydrodynamical cosmological simulation, and compare the results to predictions from analytic models. We track the evolution of galaxies with stellar mass $M_{*} > 10^{9} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ and initial bound gas mass $M_{\mathrm{gas}} > 10^{9} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ that fall into galaxy clusters ($M_{\mathrm{200c}} > 10^{14} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$) between $z = 0.27$ and $z = 0$. We divide each galaxy into its neutral gas disk and hot ionized gas halo and compare the evolution of the stripped gas fraction in the simulation to that predicted by analytic formulations for the two gas phases, as well as to a toy model that computes the motions of gas particles under the combined effects of gravity and a spatially uniform ram pressure. We find that the analytic models generally underpredict the stripping rate of neutral gas and overpredict that of ionized gas, with significant scatter between the model and simulation stripping timescales. This is due to opposing physical effects: the enhancement of ram pressure stripping by stellar feedback, and the suppression of stripping by the compaction of galactic gas.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interpreting the stacked kinetic SZ effect I: velocity reconstruction and non-linear velocity effects

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Non-linear velocity terms cancel in real-space linear reconstruction, but redshift-space distortions reintroduce a 10–20% small-scale suppression of the stacked kSZ signal.

  2. Quantifying the unwinding due to ram pressure stripping in simulated galaxies

    astro-ph.GA 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a simulated edge-on ram pressure stripping event, spiral arms unwind measurably in both gas and stars, with gas arms extending further and the asymmetry migrating inward with time.

  3. Cosmic quenching

    astro-ph.GA 2025-02 unverdicted

    A review chapter on the cosmic quenching of star formation in galaxies, covering observational demographics, physical mechanisms, and model comparisons.

Pith tools