REVIEW 1 cited by
Root-n consistent semiparametric learning with high-dimensional nuisance functions under minimal sparsity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Treatment effect estimation under unconfoundedness is a fundamental task in causal inference. In response to the challenge of analyzing high-dimensional datasets collected in substantive fields such as epidemiology, genetics, economics, and social sciences, various methods for treatment effect estimation with high-dimensional nuisance parameters (the outcome regression and the propensity score) have been developed in recent years. However, it is still unclear what is the necessary and sufficient sparsity condition on the nuisance parameters such that we can estimate the treatment effect at $1 / \sqrt{n}$-rate. In this paper, we propose a new Double-Calibration strategy that corrects the estimation bias of the nuisance parameter estimates computed by regularized high-dimensional techniques and demonstrate that the corresponding Doubly-Calibrated estimator achieves $1 / \sqrt{n}$-rate as long as one of the nuisance parameters is sparse with sparsity below $\sqrt{n} / \log p$, where $p$ denotes the ambient dimension of the covariates, whereas the other nuisance parameter can be arbitrarily complex and completely misspecified. The Double-Calibration strategy can also be applied to settings other than treatment effect estimation, e.g. regression coefficient estimation in the presence of a diverging number of controls in a semiparametric partially linear model, and local average treatment effect estimation with instrumental variables.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Stabilized Higher-Order Influence Functions: Statistical Theory of a Class of Bilinear Forms
Same-sample stabilized HOIF estimators for bilinear forms are √n-CAN for k=o(n) and more numerically stable than sample-split empirical HOIFs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.